For essay #3, perform a significant revision to last unit’s essay. Revise your work by doing the following:
Include at least two additional outside perspectives on the future of higher education. (You will discover these outside perspectives by conducting library research, and you will include them via quotation, paraphrase, and/or summary, which we will practice in this unit’s discussion.)
Argue for specific recommendations about how higher education could be re-designed for the students of the twenty-first century.
As you revise last unit’s essays to meet these new goals, you may also expand, edit, restructure, and delete from your second essay, in order to make a clear, effective argument about how to adjust college education for today’s students. This unit’s essay should not merely be last unit’s with a few new paragraphs tacked on, but should be a re-envisioned essay.
You might begin by designing a working thesis about how higher education needs to change. Then, begin researching what other writers have said already about your ideas. Start with an search on your subject using the Park University McAfee Memorial Library’s Pirate Search feature , but also consider consulting Google Scholar (Links to an external site.). We will spend time this unit discussing and analyzing sources together.
Think about what you would like to teach your readers about how higher education should change. Consider making precise, practical recommendations. Be sure to provide explicit reasoning, and describe the implications of your ideas for today’s college students of history. Make sure that every paragraph of Essay #3 points your readers toward your particular focus and argument.
Some of you may find it possible to use some material from essay #2, and others will simply use essay #2 as a launching off point. Either way, I will be looking for a revised thesis, enhanced supporting arguments, incorporation of new research, etc. Remember the difference between revision and editing; this is a revision project, not an exercise in editing essay #2. In short, although you will use essay #2 as a basis, essay #3 should be a significant re-envisioning, with a revised thesis and development. Essay #3 should have a new title to reflect this revised content.
Please craft a short description (this can be in bulleted list form if you would like) of the changes and transformations you made in revising essay #2 to create essay #3. Submit this description as either a second file or as a new page (after Works Cited) at the end of your essay #3 file. Failure to submit this required information will result in a letter grade deduction from essay #3.
Guidelines for Essay #3
Style/Format: This, as all essays in EN106, should be formatted in a standard scholarly format. (Most students follow APA guidelines, which are outlined in Easy Writer.) No matter what format you follow, be sure to do the following:
Use 12 point, Times New Roman font, double-spaced.
Use 1-inch margins top, bottom, and sides.
Research & Documentation: Because you will rely on the work of others to make your argument, this essay must include formal references to not only the assigned readings but also the sources you locate via research. Use your skills of quotation, paraphrase, and summary to incorporate these other writers’ perspectives, and be sure to provide in-text citations using a standard scholarly style outlined in Easy Writer, such as APA.
For the best custom essay writing experience and great discounts on the above or a similar topic,
At qualityuniversitypapers.com we provide:
Essays written from scratch – 100% original,
The best guarantee on deadlines,
Competitive prices and excellent quality,
24/7 customer support,
Priority on their privacy,
Unlimited free revisions upon request, and
Plagiarism free work.